REAP Global Est. 2007

REAP Global Inc — since 2007

Some deals do not stall on the numbers.

They stall on a ministry that will not sign, a partner who has stopped returning calls, and a set of assumptions that do not survive contact with the country you are operating in. That is the work we take.

Mandate

Cross-border negotiation

Counterparties

Governments & ministries

Clients

Large & mid-cap

Posture

Confidential by default

The problem

Roadblocks are rarely commercial.

By the time a project reaches us, the commercial case is usually sound and the legal work is usually done. What is blocking it is something else: a regulator with an unstated objection, a cultural read that was wrong, a political calendar nobody mapped, or a counterparty whose real decision-maker was never in the room.

Those obstacles do not yield to more pressure or a better deck. They yield to someone who can sit with the other side, understand what they actually need, and find the version of the deal that both parties can defend at home.

We are not a substitute for your bankers or your counsel. We are who you call when the process has stopped and no one can tell you precisely why.

Organizational capacity under increasing load A cross-section of a vessel. As the load increases beyond the level it was designed for, hairline fractures open along the walls and the structure begins to lose what it is holding. DESIGN CAPACITY LOAD

Load 35% of design Within capacity

The structure holds what it was built to hold. Nothing to see, and nothing to report.

The diagnosis

Most failures are capacity failures that nobody logged.

An organization is built to hold a certain load. Then the market moves, the mandate widens, a new jurisdiction is added, and the same structure is asked to carry something heavier than it was designed for.

It usually works — for a while. The strain shows up first as small fractures: a slower approval, a renegotiated term, a country manager who stops escalating. Because the erosion is gradual, it gets absorbed rather than reported. Revenue and headcount are poured in to compensate, which masks the fracture instead of closing it.

Then one condition changes and the loss becomes visible all at once. By that point people call it a crisis. It was a capacity problem, and it was measurable years earlier.

How we measure capacity →

The method

Assess. Develop. Implement.

The sequence matters more than it sounds. Most failed interventions skip the first step and pay for it in the third.

01

Assessment

We map the actual decision structure — who signs, who can veto quietly, what each party has to be able to justify afterwards, and where the organization's own capacity is already fractured. This is diagnostic work, and it is deliberately unflattering.

02

Development

We build the path: the sequence of conversations, the terms that can survive on both sides, the concessions worth making early, and the ones to hold. Where infrastructure or local capability is the constraint, we design what has to be built alongside the deal.

03

Implementation

We stay in the room. Agreements fail in execution far more often than in principle, usually because the party who has to deliver was never properly consulted. We hold the process together until the thing is actually operating.

The process in full →

Next step

Tell us what has stopped.

A first conversation is confidential and costs nothing. If the problem is not one we are right for, we will say so and point you somewhere better.

Start a conversation